食品伙伴網(wǎng)訊 2023年3月17日,歐盟食品安全局(EFSA)就審查二硫代氨基甲酸酯(dithiocarbamates)的現(xiàn)有最大殘留水平發(fā)布意見(jiàn)。
根據(jù)歐盟委員會(huì)第396/2005號(hào)法規(guī)第12章,歐盟食品安全局審查了二硫代氨基甲酸酯的最大殘留限量。根據(jù)對(duì)現(xiàn)有數(shù)據(jù)的評(píng)估,提出了MRL提案,并進(jìn)行了消費(fèi)者風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估。監(jiān)管框架要求的一些信息缺失,并發(fā)現(xiàn)可能對(duì)消費(fèi)者造成慢性/急性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。因此,消費(fèi)者風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估僅被認(rèn)為是指示性的,EFSA提出的一些MRL建議仍需風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理者進(jìn)一步考慮,并且還應(yīng)考慮降低消費(fèi)者風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的措施。部分原文報(bào)道如下:
According to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, EFSA has reviewed the maximum residue levels (MRLs) currently established at European level for the group of pesticide active substances dithiocarbamates. To assess the occurrence of metiram, ziram, maneb and mancozeb residues in plants, processed commodities, rotational crops and livestock, EFSA considered the conclusions derived in the framework of Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009, the MRLs established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (codex maximum residue limits; CXLs) as well as the European authorisations and the import tolerances reported by Member States and the UK (including the supporting residues data) for metiram and mancozeb. Propineb and thiram were not considered further in this assessment since it is expected that all uses for these compounds, including import tolerances, have been withdrawn after the lowering of all the MRLs to the limit of quantification (LOQ) following the EFSA MRLs reviews completed, respectively, in 2020 and 2021. When reviewing the MRLs for the common residue definition (determined and expressed as CS2), EFSA was requested to consider also the monitoring data from organic samples collected and made available by the EURLs, reflecting the sulfur naturally occurring in crops and not related to the uses of the dithiocarbamates. based on the assessment of the available data, MRL proposals were derived, and a consumer risk assessment was carried out. Some information required by the regulatory framework was missing and a possible chronic/acute risk to consumers was identified. Hence, the consumer risk assessment is considered indicative only, all MRL proposals derived by EFSA still require further consideration by risk managers and measures for reduction of the consumer exposure should also be considered.
本文由食品伙伴網(wǎng)食品資訊中心編輯,有任何疑問(wèn),請(qǐng)聯(lián)系news@foodmate.net。